United States v. Mathis

832 F.3d 886
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 10, 2016
DocketNo: 14-2396
StatusPublished

This text of 832 F.3d 886 (United States v. Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mathis, 832 F.3d 886 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

On June 23, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the judgment of this court in United States v. Mathis, 786 F.3d 1068 (8th Cir. 2015) (“Mathis I”), holding that “[bjecause the elements of Iowa’s burglary law are broader than those of generic burglary, Mathis’s convictions under that law cannot give rise to an ACCA [ (Armed Career Criminal Act) ] sentence.” Mathis v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016). Based on the Supreme Court’s action, we vacate Section II.A. of our opinion, reverse the district court’s ’ finding that Mathis has the requisite predicate “violent felonies” to be categorized as an armed career criminal under the ACCA, and remand for resentencing. For the reasons set forth in Section II.B. of our opinion, we affirm the district court in all other respects. See Mathis I, 786 F.3d at 1075-76.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Richard Mathis
786 F.3d 1068 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
Mathis v. United States
579 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
832 F.3d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mathis-ca8-2016.