United States v. Mathis

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mathis

585 F. App'x 97

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2014·No. No. 14-7038·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Gerard Mathis appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motions to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Mathis, No. 2:05-cr-00082-AWA-JEB-5 (E.D. Va. June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Gerard Mathis appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motions to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Mathis, No. 2:05-cr-00082-AWA-JEB-5 (E.D. Va. June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mathis, 585 F. App'x 97 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 97 (United States v. Mathis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.