United States v. Mateo

85 F. App'x 355
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2003
Docket03-20228
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 F. App'x 355 (United States v. Mateo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mateo, 85 F. App'x 355 (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Vidal Mateo appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine, possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. He argues that the district court abused its discretion by allowing the testimony of eight Government witnesses in light of the fact that the prosecutor failed to comply with discovery provisions contained in Fed. R.Crim. Proc. 16. He further argues that the cumulative effect of the alleged errors warrants reversal.

Our review of the record discloses no errors that warrant reversal. See United States v. Doucette, 979 F.2d 1042, 1044-45 (5th Cir.1992). Because Mateo has shown no error, his cumulative-error contention is without merit. See United States v. Neal, 27 F.3d 1035, 1052 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, Mateo’s conviction is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mateo v. United States
541 U.S. 952 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 F. App'x 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mateo-ca5-2003.