United States v. Mason

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mason. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 F. App'x 469
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2005·No. 04-40917·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40917 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CEDRIC DWAYNE MASON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-38-1-RC-WCR --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cedric Dwayne Mason appeals the sentence imposed following

his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine

base. He contends that he should have received a reduction in

his offense level for acceptance of responsibility, even though

he was arrested for similar conduct while on bail for the instant

offense. He also failed to comply with other terms of pretrial

release, and he had to be arrested to compel his presence at

pretrial proceedings.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-40917 -2-

Mason did not carry his burden of showing that the district

court committed clear error by refusing to reduce his sentence

for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Flucas,

99 F.3d 177, 180 (5th Cir. 1996). The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mason, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Mason (United States v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Flucas
99 F.3d 177 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)