United States v. Mason

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mason

670 F. App'x 74

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2016·No. No. 16-6866·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamell Mason appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive and unauthorized. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mason, Nos. 3:09-cr-00087-JPB-JES-6; 3:16-cv-00044-JPB-RWT, 2016 WL 3448619 (N.D. W. Va. June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamell Mason appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive and unauthorized. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mason, Nos. 3:09-cr-00087-JPB-JES-6; 3:16-cv-00044-JPB-RWT, 2016 WL 3448619 (N.D. W. Va. June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Mason, 670 F. App'x 74 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 74 (United States v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related