United States v. Maryland Ex Rel. Meyer

382 U.S. 158, 86 S. Ct. 304, 15 L. Ed. 2d 226, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 208
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 6, 1965·No. 543·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to file a conditional petition for rehearing is granted and the petition for rehearing is also granted. The order of December 16, 1963, 375 U. S. 954, denying the petition for writ of certiorari is vacated, and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed in conformity with our decision in Maryland for the use of Levin et al. v. United States, 381 U. S. 41, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for further proceedings with respect to the unresolved issues tendered in respondents’ bill of complaint.

R ü g0 ordere±

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that a remand is legally unjustified, dissent from that part of the Court’s order. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maryland Ex Rel. Meyer, 382 U.S. 158, 86 S. Ct. 304, 15 L. Ed. 2d 226, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 208 (1965).

382 U.S. 158 (United States v. Maryland Ex Rel. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia v. Vossoughi
963 A.2d 1162 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
Campins v. Capels
461 N.E.2d 712 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1984)
Maryland Ex Rel. Gliedman v. Capital Airlines, Inc.
267 F. Supp. 298 (D. Maryland, 1967)