United States v. Mary Fry Dawson
This text of 355 F.2d 207 (United States v. Mary Fry Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
355 F.2d 207
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Mary Fry DAWSON, Appellant.
No. 14887.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued January 17, 1966.
Decided February 15, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; William J. Nealon, Jr., Judge.
William D. Morgan, Scranton, Pa., for appellant.
Carlon M. O'Malley, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Scranton, Pa. (Bernard J. Brown, U. S. Atty., Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before KALODNER, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On review of the record we find no error. The Judgment of the sentence will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 F.2d 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mary-fry-dawson-ca3-1966.