United States v. Mary Alice Wolf

842 F.2d 334, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3263, 1988 WL 23678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mary Alice Wolf. Read the opinion of the Court — 879 F.2d 1320
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 15, 1988·No. 87-5816·Unpublished

Opinion

842 F.2d 334

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mary Alice WOLF, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-5816.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 15, 1988.

Before ENGEL, MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mary Alice Wolf, 842 F.2d 334, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3263, 1988 WL 23678 (6th Cir. 1988).

842 F.2d 334 (United States v. Mary Alice Wolf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.