United States v. Marvin Vondon Hart, Jr.

382 F.2d 1020
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 26, 1967·No. 16286·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was found guilty on an indictment charging him with failure to report to his Draft Board for instructions to proceed to his assigned place of employment for civilian work following his classification as- a conscientious objector.

On this appeal the defendant challenges the Draft Board’s denial to grant him a ministerial classification and the validity of the Draft Board’s order to report for civilian work.

On review of the record we find no error in the Draft Board’s denial of a ministerial classification. Further, we do not subscribe to the defendant’s contention that the Board was without power to direct him to report to it for assignment to civilian work.

The judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

We note our appreciation of the indefatigable and able representation of the defendant by Mercer D. Tate, court-appointed counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marvin Vondon Hart, Jr., 382 F.2d 1020 (3d Cir. 1967).

382 F.2d 1020 (United States v. Marvin Vondon Hart, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. United States
391 U.S. 956 (Supreme Court, 1968)