United States v. Marvin Skipworth

14 F.3d 598, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4981, 1994 WL 4690

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 7, 1994
• Docket: 93-6577
• Status: Published

Opinion

14 F.3d 598
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Marvin SKIPWORTH, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6577.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem, Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-89-204-WS, CR-90-63-WS, CA-91-163-6)

Marvin Skipworth, Appellant Pro Se.

Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Skipworth, Nos. CR-89-204-WS; CR-90-63-WS; CA-91-163-6 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We deny Appellant's Motion to Remand for purposes of amending the petition