United States v. Martinez-Segura

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 2023
Docket22-10582
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Martinez-Segura (United States v. Martinez-Segura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Martinez-Segura, (5th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

Case: 22-10582 Document: 00516610680 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10582 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ January 13, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Miguel Angel Martinez-Segura,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-337-3 ______________________________

Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Angel Martinez-Segura has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Segura has filed a response requesting the

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10582 Document: 00516610680 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2023

No. 22-10582

appointment of substitute counsel. That request is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Martinez-Segura’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wagner
158 F.3d 901 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Martinez-Segura, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-segura-ca5-2023.