United States v. Martinez-Robledo
This text of 372 F. App'x 563 (United States v. Martinez-Robledo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A jury convicted Luis Martinez-Robledo (Martinez) of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, conspiring to launder monetary instruments, and aiding and *564 abetting. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846; 18 U.S.C. § 1956. He appeals his sentence of 188 months of imprisonment.
Martinez maintains that the district court erred in imposing a two-level sentencing enhancement for obstructing justice by perjuring himself at trial. The district court considered various statements made by Martinez during his trial and concluded that the statements were false, that they pertained to material matters, and that they were willful and not prompted by confusion or misunderstanding. Because the court’s findings established a factual predicate for finding perjury, the district court did not err in imposing the enhancement. See United States v. Creech, 408 F.3d 264, 270-71 (5th Cir.2005); United States v. Wild, 92 F.3d 304, 308 (5th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cut. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
372 F. App'x 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-robledo-ca5-2010.