United States v. Martinez-Rios

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Martinez-Rios

202 F. App'x 17

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martinez-Rios. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 F. App'x 520 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2006·No. 05-51486·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Florentino Martinez-Rios raises ar *18 guments that are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *18 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Florentino Martinez-Rios raises ar *18 guments that are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *18 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Martinez-Rios, 202 F. App'x 17 (5th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

202 F. App'x 17 (United States v. Martinez-Rios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related