United States v. Martinez-Lopez
This text of 61 F. App'x 426 (United States v. Martinez-Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ricardo Martinez-Lopez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for unlawful reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Martinez-Lopez contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred by sentencing him under the enhanced statutory maximum sentence contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 because he never admitted at the change of plea hearing that he had sustained a prior aggravated felony conviction. As Martinez-Lopez concedes, these arguments are foreclosed [427]*427by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 966, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001). Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 F. App'x 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-lopez-ca9-2003.