United States v. Martinez-Flores
This text of 320 F. App'x 741 (United States v. Martinez-Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Sergio Martinez-Flores appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Martinez-Flores contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to properly weigh some of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and improperly imposed a sentence within the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. These contentions fail. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 600-02, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 260-63, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-flores-ca9-2009.