United States v. Martinez-Espinoza

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martinez-Espinoza. Read the opinion of the Court — 299 F.3d 414
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2003·No. 02-50085·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50085 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERARDO MARTINEZ-ESPINOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-01-CR-205-ALL-SS -------------------- February 20, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerardo Martinez-Espinoza (Martinez) challenges his sentence

following his guilty-plea conviction for being found in the

United States after a prior deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. He argues that his prior state felony conviction for

possession of cocaine did not merit the eight-level adjustment

provided in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) for an aggravated felony.

Martinez’s arguments regarding the definitions of “drug

trafficking offense” and “aggravated felony” were recently

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-50085 -2-

rejected by this court in United States v. Caicedo-Cuero,

312 F.3d 697, 706-11 (5th Cir. 2002). The district court did not

err in assessing an eight-level adjustment, pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C), to Martinez’s sentencing guideline calculation.

Id. The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez-Espinoza, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Martinez-Espinoza (United States v. Martinez-Espinoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jesus Martin Caicedo-Cuero
312 F.3d 697 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)