United States v. Martinez-Cruz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2000·No. 99-40440·Unpublished

Opinion

No. 99-40440

-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40440

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR MARTINEZ-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-198-1

--------------------

April 14, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Hector Martinez-Cruz appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. His sole allegation of error is that the district court erred in denying a motion to suppress statements he made to law-enforcement officers after his apprehension. Martinez-Cruz has not shown that the court committed clear error in accepting the testimony of law- enforcement officials that no one struck him or otherwise coerced him into waiving his rights or making a statement. See United

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 99-40440

-2-

States v. Restrepo, 994 F.2d 173, 183 (5th Cir. 1993). Having reviewed the record, we conclude that Martinez-Cruz has shown no error in the district court’s determination that he voluntarily waived his rights and gave a statement about the offense. See id. at 184.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez-Cruz, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Martinez-Cruz (United States v. Martinez-Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related