United States v. Martinez-Cantu

86 F. App'x 720
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martinez-Cantu. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 F. App'x 641
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 4, 2004·No. 03-50177·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dora Alicia Martinez-Cantu (“Martinez”) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Martinez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but she has not filed a response. Based on our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez-Cantu, 86 F. App'x 720 (5th Cir. 2004).

86 F. App'x 720 (United States v. Martinez-Cantu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)