United States v. Martinez

515 F. App'x 639
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2013
DocketNo. 12-4021
StatusPublished

This text of 515 F. App'x 639 (United States v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Martinez, 515 F. App'x 639 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Guadalupe Martinez appeals the 46-month prison sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to drug charges. Counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and seeks leave to withdraw. For reversal, counsel argues that the sentence imposed was greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the sentence, falling at the bottom of the uncontested Guidelines range, was not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461, 464 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc). Further, we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Feemster
572 F.3d 455 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
515 F. App'x 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-ca8-2013.