United States v. Martinez
This text of United States v. Martinez (United States v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 25-10602 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2026
United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit Fifth Circuit
FILED ____________ January 6, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce No. 25-10602 Clerk Summary Calendar ____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Daniel Favian Martinez,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:24-CR-112-1 ______________________________
Before King, Haynes, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Favian Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-10602 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/06/2026
No. 25-10602
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-ca5-2026.