United States v. Martinez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2006
Docket04-20451
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Martinez (United States v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Martinez, (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20451 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHIRLEY MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-159-ALL --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Shirley

Martinez, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Martinez has not filed a response to the motion. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-ca5-2006.