United States v. Martinez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 151 F.3d 384
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2000·No. 00-40053·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40053 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL MARTINEZ, also known as Martin Garcia-Valdez, also known as Jose Manuel Castro- Valdez,

Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-387-1 -------------------- August 3, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel

Martinez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez

received a copy of counsel's motion and brief but has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Martinez (United States v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)