United States v. Martinez
This text of United States v. Martinez (United States v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-20438 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROSA MARTINEZ MARTINEZ, also known as Nina, also known as Maria Cristina Torres,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-393-2 -------------------- February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant appeals the sentence imposed upon her guilty-plea
conviction for aiding and abetting the possession with the intent
to distribute cocaine. She argues that the district court erred
in denying application of the safety-valve provision provided in
U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 because she timely provided to the Government
all information and evidence she had concerning the offense.
Under § 5C1.2, the district court may sentence a defendant
without regard to the statutory minimum sentence if it is
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. determined, inter alia, that the defendant truthfully provided
the Government with “all information and evidence the defendant
has concerning the offense[.]” § 5C1.2(5). We review a district
court’s refusal to apply § 5C1.2 based on factual findings for
clear error. See United States v. Flanagan, 80 F.3d 143, 145
(5th Cir. 1996). We perceive no such error here.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-ca5-2000.