United States v. Martinez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 F.3d 910
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 5, 1996·No. 95-50871·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50871 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-95-CV-498

October 23, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Oscar Martinez appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255. Martinez argues that the district court erred by concluding that he was not denied

the effective assistance of counsel on appeal.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Martinez, No. SA-95-CA-498 (W.D.

Tex. Nov. 15, 1995).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martinez, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Martinez (United States v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related