United States v. Martinez
71 M.J. 158, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 177
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 15, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0224/AF
StatusPublished
This text of 71 M.J. 158 (United States v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Martinez, 71 M.J. 158, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 177 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA S31779. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE LOWER COURT MISAPPLIED UNITED STATES v. FOSLER AND UNITED STATES v. WATKINS IN FINDING THAT, DESPITE FAILING TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT, THE ARTICLE 134 SPECIFICATION HERE STATES AN OFFENSE.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 158, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-armfor-2012.