United States v. Martinez-Almazan
This text of 101 F. App'x 265 (United States v. Martinez-Almazan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Martinez-Almazan appeals his conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred in precluding him from presenting the testimony of an immigration expert. Martinez-Almazan’s proffer did not establish that the expert testimony would have been relevant to his defense. See United States v. Cordoba, 194 F.3d 1053, 1056 (9th Cir.1999). The district court did not abuse its discretion in precluding the testimony. See United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 364 F.3d 1142, 1146-47 (9th Cir.2004).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 F. App'x 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martinez-almazan-ca9-2004.