United States v. Martin Ramos-Ordonez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 2018
Docket18-50048
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Martin Ramos-Ordonez (United States v. Martin Ramos-Ordonez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Martin Ramos-Ordonez, (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 18-50048 Document: 00514400865 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/26/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals

No. 18-50048 Fifth Circuit

FILED Summary Calendar March 26, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARTIN RAMOS-ORDONEZ,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-389-1

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for revocation of the pre-trial detention order is AFFIRMED. This court applies a deferential standard of review when considering a district court’s pre-trial detention order. United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir. 1989). Reviewing the record

* Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 18-50048 Document: 00514400865 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/26/2018

No. 18-50048 as a whole under this deferential standard of review, we hold that appellant has not established his entitlement to relief. AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. William Bruce Hare
873 F.2d 796 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Martin Ramos-Ordonez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martin-ramos-ordonez-ca5-2018.