United States v. Martin Perez-Padron

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 15, 2009·No. 09-40622·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2009

No. 09-40622 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTIN PEREZ-PADRON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No.2:09-CR-149-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Martin Perez-Padron presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Cepeda-Rios, 530 F.3d 333, 335-36 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that even after Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006), a second state conviction for simple possession of a controlled substance qualifies as an aggravated felony that supports the imposition of an eight-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martin Perez-Padron, (5th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Martin Perez-Padron (United States v. Martin Perez-Padron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. Gonzales
549 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court, 2006)
United States v. Cepeda-Rios
530 F.3d 333 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)