United States v. Martin Perez-Padron
This text of United States v. Martin Perez-Padron (United States v. Martin Perez-Padron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED December 15, 2009 No. 09-40622 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee v.
MARTIN PEREZ-PADRON,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No.2:09-CR-149-1
Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Martin Perez-Padron presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Cepeda-Rios, 530 F.3d 333, 335-36 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that even after Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006), a second state conviction for simple possession of a controlled substance qualifies as an aggravated felony that supports the imposition of an eight-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Martin Perez-Padron, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martin-perez-padron-ca5-2009.