United States v. Martin
This text of United States v. Martin (United States v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED February 20, 2008 No. 03-20908 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CANDANCE MESHON MARTIN
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-41-3
Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Candance Meshon Martin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martin has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martin-ca5-2008.