United States v. Martin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 F.3d 464
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 31, 1996·No. 95-40734·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40734 Summary Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACQUELINE MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CR-140-1 - - - - - - - - - -

May 8, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jacqueline Martin appeals her jury conviction for interstate

transportation of stolen securities and uttering forged

securities. She argues that the district court erred in denying

her motion to suppress statements made without the presence of

her attorney, who represented her on charged state offenses,

during an interview by federal agents concerning uncharged

federal offenses because the state and federal offenses were

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40734 -2-

inextricably intertwined. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. For essentially the reasons given by the

district court, there was no error in the denial of the motion to

suppress Martin's statements. United States v. Martin, No. 1:94-

CR-140-1 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 1995).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martin, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Martin (United States v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.