United States v. Martin
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40734 Summary Calendar __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JACQUELINE MARTIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CR-140-1 - - - - - - - - - -
May 8, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jacqueline Martin appeals her jury conviction for interstate
transportation of stolen securities and uttering forged
securities. She argues that the district court erred in denying
her motion to suppress statements made without the presence of
her attorney, who represented her on charged state offenses,
during an interview by federal agents concerning uncharged
federal offenses because the state and federal offenses were
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40734 -2-
inextricably intertwined. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. For essentially the reasons given by the
district court, there was no error in the denial of the motion to
suppress Martin's statements. United States v. Martin, No. 1:94-
CR-140-1 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Martin (United States v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.