United States v. Martin

33 F. App'x 43
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 F. App'x 119
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 30, 2002·No. No. 01-2711·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

This is a sentencing appeal. Appellant Rindy Lee Martin, who pleaded guilty to armed bank robbery (in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d)) and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence (in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)) contends the District Court erred in failing to apply a downward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because he was a minor participant. Our review is for clear error. United States v. Brown, 250 F.3d 811, 818 (3d Cir.2001). The evidence demonstrates that Martin provided his co-defendant Pizarro with the handgun used in the robbery and participated as the getaway driver. Under this set of facts, the trial judge did not clearly err in denying the adjustment.

For these reasons, the judgment of sentence will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Martin, 33 F. App'x 43 (3d Cir. 2002).

33 F. App'x 43 (United States v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Melvinisha Brown
250 F.3d 811 (Third Circuit, 2001)