United States v. Marshall Monroe Dean, United States of America v. Michael Roy Coffey

506 F.2d 701, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6141
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1974
Docket73-2275
StatusPublished

This text of 506 F.2d 701 (United States v. Marshall Monroe Dean, United States of America v. Michael Roy Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marshall Monroe Dean, United States of America v. Michael Roy Coffey, 506 F.2d 701, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6141 (4th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

506 F.2d 701

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Marshall monroe DEAN, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Michael Roy COFFEY, Appellant.

Nos. 73-2275, 73-2292.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted on briefs Oct. 29, 1974.
Decided Nov. 8, 1974.

John A. Field, III, U.S. Atty., Ray L. Hampton, II, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief for appellee in Nos. 73-2275 and 73-2292.

James C. Cain, Bluefield, W. Va., on brief for appellant in No. 73-2275.

Joseph M. Sanders, Jr., Bluefield, w. Va. (Sanders & Blue, Bluefield, W. Va.), on brief for appellant in No. 73-2292.

Before BOREMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and WINTER and WIDENER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

The sole and identical question raised by the defendant in each of these cases is whether the word 'minority' as used in 18 U.S.C. 5034, prior to the 1974 Amendments to the Juvenile Delinquency Act, refers to a person who has not attained his twenty-first birthday, or whether it refers to a person who has not attained his eighteenth birthday.

In United States v. Shaver, 506 F.2d 699 (4th Cir., 1974), we have decided that the word 'minority' as so used refers to a person who has not attained his twenty-first birthday, and we so hold here.

Accordingly, in each of these cases, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the decision of the district court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Steven Earl Shaver
506 F.2d 699 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Dean
506 F.2d 701 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 F.2d 701, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marshall-monroe-dean-united-states-of-america-v-michael-ca4-1974.