United States v. Marshall

56 F. App'x 167
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2003
Docket02-4519
StatusUnpublished

This text of 56 F. App'x 167 (United States v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marshall, 56 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jermeer Marshall pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to one count of possession with intent to distribute not more than fifty grams of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (2000). Marshall was sentenced to 262 months imprisonment. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We affirm.

We review the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea for abuse of discretion. United, States v. Ubakanma, 215 F.3d 421, 424 (4th Cir.2000). Marshall must present a “fair and just” reason for withdrawing his guilty plea. Fed. R.Crim.P. 32(e); United States v. Moore, 931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th Cir.1991). Based on the factors set forth in Moore, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Accordingly, we affirm Marshall’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F. App'x 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marshall-ca4-2003.