United States v. Marsha King

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7318

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARSHA KING,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marsha King, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marsha King appeals the district court’s orders denying her

“Motion To Stay Restitution Until Release From Incarceration and

To Set Schedule Payments for Assessment Fine” and her motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. King, No. 2:14-cr-

00065-RAJ-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6 & Sept. 15, 2016). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED