United States v. Marquez-Silva

158 F. App'x 220
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 2005
DocketNo. 05-11463; D.C. Docket No. 03-00277-CR-T-30-TBM
StatusPublished

This text of 158 F. App'x 220 (United States v. Marquez-Silva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marquez-Silva, 158 F. App'x 220 (11th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Duilio A. Espinosa-Montalban, appointed counsel for Efren Daniel Marquez-Silva in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our [221]*221independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Marquez-Silva’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 F. App'x 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marquez-silva-ca11-2005.