United States v. Marlow Farmer
This text of 693 F. App'x 239 (United States v. Marlow Farmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Marlow Andre Farmer seeks to appeal his 1997 criminal judgment. Because we have already considered an appeal from the same order, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Lipford, 203 F.3d 259 (4th Cir. 2000). We deny Farmer’s motions for *240 a transcript, to file a supplement, and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 F. App'x 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marlow-farmer-ca4-2017.