United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan
This text of United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan (United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30251
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-00130- v. TMB-MMS-1
MARKANTHONY DELEON ORDER SAPALASAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Filed January 15, 2025
Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Ryan D. Nelson, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges.
Order 2 USA V. SAPALASAN
ORDER
The panel unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge R. Nelson and Judge Collins voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Hawkins recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. 49, is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-markanthony-sapalasan-ca9-2025.