United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 F.4th 657
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 15, 2025·No. 21-30251·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30251

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.

3:18-cr-00130-

v. TMB-MMS-1

MARKANTHONY DELEON ORDER SAPALASAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Filed January 15, 2025

Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Ryan D. Nelson, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges.

Order

2 USA V. SAPALASAN

ORDER

The panel unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge R. Nelson and Judge Collins voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Hawkins recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. 49, is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan, (9th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan (United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.