United States v. Mark T. Stinson, Sr.

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11156 Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK T. STINSON, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:24-mj-02278-EGT-1

____________________

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11156

Before WILSON, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Mark Stinson, pro se, appeals directly from the magistrate judge’s February 14, 2024 order directing the United States Marshals Service to transfer him to the Western District of Tennessee pursuant to an arrest warrant. However, the District Court for the Southern District of Florida has not adopted this order or otherwise rendered it final, so it is not immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 636, 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982) (explaining that magistrate judge orders issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) are not final and may not be appealed until rendered final by a district court).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.