United States v. Mark Peter Colville

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 26, 2022
Docket21-11226
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Mark Peter Colville (United States v. Mark Peter Colville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mark Peter Colville, (11th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 21-11226 Date Filed: 05/26/2022 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-11226 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK PETER COLVILLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00022-LGW-BWC-2 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-11226 Date Filed: 05/26/2022 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 21-11226

Before GRANT, LUCK, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Mark Colville appeals his convictions for conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2, destruction of property on a naval installation in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1363 and 2, depredation of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1361 and 2, and trespass in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1382 and 2. He also appeals the district court’s restitution order making him jointly and severally liable for the payment of $33,503.51 to the Treasurer of the United States on behalf of the Department of the Navy. In a submission on appeal, Colville concedes that his challenge to his convictions is foreclosed by this Circuit’s decision in United States v. Grady, 18 F.4th 1275 (11th Cir. 2021). Because the parties have agreed that Colville’s appeal of the restitution order is moot, no contested issues remain. See United States v. Potts, 997 F.3d 1142, 1144–45 (11th Cir. 2021). We therefore affirm his convictions and his sentence. AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Carlton Potts
997 F.3d 1142 (Eleventh Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Clare Therese Grady
18 F.4th 1275 (Eleventh Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Mark Peter Colville, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mark-peter-colville-ca11-2022.