United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau

278 F.3d 920, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 877, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 646, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 926, 2002 WL 88881
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2002
Docket99-10538
StatusPublished

This text of 278 F.3d 920 (United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau, 278 F.3d 920, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 877, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 646, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 926, 2002 WL 88881 (9th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

The district court ordered suppression of evidence that had been discovered when Mark James Knights’ home was searched. We affirmed. See United States v. Knights, 219 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir.2000). However, the Supreme Court disagreed, and determined that the conduct of the officers was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 122 S.Ct. 587, 151 L.Ed.2d 497 (2001). It reversed and remanded for further proceedings. Id. 122 S.Ct. at 593.

We, therefore, reverse the district court’s suppression order and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Knights
534 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 2001)
United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau
219 F.3d 1138 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 F.3d 920, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 877, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 646, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 926, 2002 WL 88881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mark-james-knights-steven-simoneau-ca9-2002.