United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau

278 F.3d 920, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 877, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 646, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 926, 2002 WL 88881
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 F.3d 1138
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2002·No. 99-10538·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The district court ordered suppression of evidence that had been discovered when Mark James Knights’ home was searched. We affirmed. See United States v. Knights, 219 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir.2000). However, the Supreme Court disagreed, and determined that the conduct of the officers was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 122 S.Ct. 587, 151 L.Ed.2d 497 (2001). It reversed and remanded for further proceedings. Id. 122 S.Ct. at 593.

We, therefore, reverse the district court’s suppression order and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau, 278 F.3d 920, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 877, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 646, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 926, 2002 WL 88881 (9th Cir. 2002).

278 F.3d 920 (United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Knights
534 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 2001)
United States v. Mark James Knights Steven Simoneau
219 F.3d 1138 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)