United States v. Mark J. Giuffrida
This text of United States v. Mark J. Giuffrida (United States v. Mark J. Giuffrida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-4727
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARK J. GIUFFRIDA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-98-95)
Submitted: March 28, 2000 Decided: April 24, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hunt L. Charach, Federal Public Defender, Edward H. Weis, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Stephanie D. Thacker, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Mark J. Guiffrida appeals the district court’s order affirming
his conviction and restitution order. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Giuffrida, 66 F. Supp. 2d 811 (S.D.W.
Va. 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mark J. Giuffrida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mark-j-giuffrida-ca4-2000.