United States v. Mark Gaddy
This text of United States v. Mark Gaddy (United States v. Mark Gaddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-3420 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Mark Anthony Gaddy
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Filed: March 3, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Mark Gaddy appeals after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition. He argues the district court1 erred by denying his motion
1 The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. to dismiss the indictment because the prosecution violated the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to him. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court properly denied the motion, as Gaddy’s argument is foreclosed by our precedent. See United States v. Jackson, 110 F.4th 1120, 1125, 1129 (8th Cir. 2024), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 2708 (2025); see also United States v. Harris-Franklin, 146 F.4th 631, 637 & n.2 (8th Cir. 2025); United States v. Cameron, 99 F.4th 432, 435-36 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 314 (2024). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mark Gaddy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mark-gaddy-ca8-2026.