United States v. Mark Flaaen
This text of 440 F. App'x 516 (United States v. Mark Flaaen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mark Flaaen appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. We conclude that the revocation sentence of 20 months in prison with 40 months of supervised release was not unreasonable. We decline to review at this time Flaaen’s arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and sentence credit. See United States v. Davis, 452 F.3d 991, 994 (8th Cir.2006); United States v. Pardue, 363 F.3d 695, 699 (8th Cir.2004). With respect to Flaaen’s remaining arguments, we find no plain error. See Davis, 452 F.3d at 994 (describing plain-error review); see also United States v. Asalati, 615 F.3d 1001, 1007-08 (8th Cir.2010) (upholding curfew condition of supervised release).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 F. App'x 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mark-flaaen-ca8-2011.