United States v. Mark Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2017·No. 16-11082·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 16-11082 Document: 00514001541 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals

No. 16-11082 Fifth Circuit

FILED Summary Calendar May 22, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARK CARLOS BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:93-CR-24-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mark Carlos Brown has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brown has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-11082 Document: 00514001541 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/22/2017

No. 16-11082

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mark Brown, (5th Cir. 2017).

United States v. Mark Brown (United States v. Mark Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)