United States v. Marissa Grant

25 F. App'x 499
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 11, 2002
Docket01-3153
StatusUnpublished

This text of 25 F. App'x 499 (United States v. Marissa Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marissa Grant, 25 F. App'x 499 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Marissa Grant pleaded guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to do *500 bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 133(a)(3), and the district court 1 sentenced her to 33 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. She appeals her sentence, arguing that the district court abused its discretion and violated her due process rights by denying her downward-departure motion without holding an evidentiary hearing.

Because the district court acknowledged its authority to depart on the grounds Grant asserted, its discretionary denial of her departure motion is unreviewable. See United States v. Turechek, 138 F.3d 1226, 1228 (8th Cir.1998); United States v. Gibson, 2000 WL 268482 at *1 (8th Cir. Mar. 10, 2000) (unpublished per curiam), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 939, 121 S.Ct. 332, 148 L.Ed.2d 267 (2000).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. George W. Turechek, III
138 F.3d 1226 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. App'x 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marissa-grant-ca8-2002.