United States v. Marion William Dodson, Jr.

14 F.3d 597, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37108, 1993 WL 533357
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 23, 1993
Docket92-6809
StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.3d 597 (United States v. Marion William Dodson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marion William Dodson, Jr., 14 F.3d 597, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37108, 1993 WL 533357 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

14 F.3d 597
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Marion William DODSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6809.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Dec. 23, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Marion William Dodson, Jr., appellant pro se.

Christine Fay Wright, Office of the United States Attorney, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for specific enforcement of the paragraph in his plea agreement providing that the government reserved the right to move for a substantial assistance departure at or after sentencing, pursuant to sentencing guideline section 5K1.1* or Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b), if it found that such a motion was warranted. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dodson, No. CR-91-111-A (E.D. Va. July 17, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, Sec. 5K1.1 (Nov.1992)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 F.3d 597, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37108, 1993 WL 533357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marion-william-dodson-jr-ca4-1993.