United States v. Marion Walker

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 8, 2020·No. 19-12130·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 19-12130 Date Filed: 01/08/2020 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 19-12130 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cr-00201-HES-JRK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARION WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant. ________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________

(January 8, 2020)

Before WILSON, GRANT and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal

waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, Case: 19-12130 Date Filed: 01/08/2020 Page: 2 of 2

997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d 1330,

1334 (11th Cir. 2005) (“Plea bargains . . . are like contracts and should be

interpreted in accord with what the parties intended.”); Dohrmann v. United States,

442 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2006) (restitution statute has no prescribed

statutory maximum).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marion Walker, (11th Cir. 2020).

United States v. Marion Walker (United States v. Marion Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Angela Ann Rubbo
396 F.3d 1330 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Bernhard Dohrmann v. United States
442 F.3d 1279 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)