United States v. Marion Walker
This text of United States v. Marion Walker (United States v. Marion Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 19-12130 Date Filed: 01/08/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 19-12130 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cr-00201-HES-JRK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARION WALKER,
Defendant-Appellant. ________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________
(January 8, 2020)
Before WILSON, GRANT and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal
waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, Case: 19-12130 Date Filed: 01/08/2020 Page: 2 of 2
997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced
if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d 1330,
1334 (11th Cir. 2005) (“Plea bargains . . . are like contracts and should be
interpreted in accord with what the parties intended.”); Dohrmann v. United States,
442 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2006) (restitution statute has no prescribed
statutory maximum).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Marion Walker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marion-walker-ca11-2020.