United States v. Marion H. MacKenzie

474 F.2d 1008
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 1973
Docket71-1925
StatusPublished

This text of 474 F.2d 1008 (United States v. Marion H. MacKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marion H. MacKenzie, 474 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We adopt the opinion of the district court, reported in 322 F.Supp. 1058 (D.C. D.Nev.1971) as the opinion of this court, and affirm the judgment.

In our view, the only real issue on appeal consisted of the trial judge’s determination that the disparity between the fair market value of the real property and the sale price, reflected in the government’s successful bid, was not so great as to shock the conscience and require denial of confirmation of the foreclosure sale. Thus, the sole question was, did that determination constitute an abuse of discretion? As indicated by oup decision affirming the judgment, we cannot say that the answer is “yes.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mackenzie
322 F. Supp. 1058 (D. Nevada, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F.2d 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marion-h-mackenzie-ca9-1973.