United States v. Marion H. MacKenzie

474 F.2d 1008
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 28, 1973·No. 71-1925·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We adopt the opinion of the district court, reported in 322 F.Supp. 1058 (D.C. D.Nev.1971) as the opinion of this court, and affirm the judgment.

In our view, the only real issue on appeal consisted of the trial judge’s determination that the disparity between the fair market value of the real property and the sale price, reflected in the government’s successful bid, was not so great as to shock the conscience and require denial of confirmation of the foreclosure sale. Thus, the sole question was, did that determination constitute an abuse of discretion? As indicated by oup decision affirming the judgment, we cannot say that the answer is “yes.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marion H. MacKenzie, 474 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1973).

474 F.2d 1008 (United States v. Marion H. MacKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mackenzie
322 F. Supp. 1058 (D. Nevada, 1971)