United States v. Mario Perez-Razo

598 F. App'x 281
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 2015
Docket14-40960
StatusUnpublished

This text of 598 F. App'x 281 (United States v. Mario Perez-Razo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mario Perez-Razo, 598 F. App'x 281 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Perez-Razo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Perez-Razo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The written judgment contains a clerical error. Perez-Razo pleaded guilty to the offense of attempted illegal reentry by a previously deported alien; the written judgment incorrectly identifies the nature of the offense as “[r]e-entry of a deported alien.” Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the error in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. See United States v. Angeles-Mascote, 206 F.3d 529, 531 (5th Cir.2000); United States v. Figueroa-Noriega, 530 Fed.Appx. 382, 383 (5th Cir.2013); United States v. Rosales, 448 Fed.Appx. 466, 466-67 (5th Cir.2011).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Angeles-Mascote
206 F.3d 529 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Francisco Rosales
448 F. App'x 466 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Pedro Figueroa-Noriega
530 F. App'x 382 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
598 F. App'x 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mario-perez-razo-ca5-2015.