United States v. Mario Melo

295 F. App'x 955
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 6, 2008·No. 08-10959·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Neal Gary Rosensweig, counsel for Mario Meló, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Melo’s sentence following re-sentencing is AFFIRMED. We DENY as moot Melo’s motion to dismiss counsel on appeal, and we DENY Melo’s motions to dismiss his appeal and/or hold his appeal in abeyance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mario Melo, 295 F. App'x 955 (11th Cir. 2008).

295 F. App'x 955 (United States v. Mario Melo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)